設為首頁收藏本站

大家覺得呢兩塊板邊塊better?

Share
21 3205
發表於 2011-3-26 11:41:21 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
基本上打得了 six.one tour的人技術有一定水平,自己都會選球拍了,根本不用問。
所以樓主問的話,就可以二話不說另一支比較好,雖然PINK 都不是容易HANDLE。

至於為什麼不說Wlison BLX Blade 98,是因為我不知道樓主是男是女。
而他/她問兩支指定球拍的比較,另說其他球拍好像問非所答。
不過我最後建議也有提醒樓主作其他考慮,始終樓主沒有說明他/她的打法。

發私人信息給ec20

發表於 2011-3-26 23:01:42 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
各位師兄高人:不如我哋討論吓重板和輕板嘅分別?
如樓主所博兩支板之重量分別?

發私人信息給Gary

發表於 2011-3-26 23:43:17 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
各位師兄高人:不如我哋討論吓重板和輕板嘅分別?
如樓主所博兩支板之重量分別? ...
ec20 發表於 2011-3-26 23:01

我唔係高人,只係初學者,討論多啲可以學多啲...師兄係想討論重拍同輕拍使用上嘅分別?其實整體上,仲要睇 Balance 同 Swingweight,另外一支係 16/19,一支係 18/20,兩支 Stiffness 差唔多就可以唔理住...其實可以討論嘅嘢係好多...
咁師兄你有無高見呢?
發表於 2011-4-1 10:59:08 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
回復 12# ec20


    重量上係冇分別 320g 同319g 根本上就一樣(唔計wilson D 咁差做工)
但2 支個balance pt. 會令到2 支有明顯的分別 (2pt HL & 9pt HL)
計出來 blade 98個swingweight 應該比 B90 還要用多D 力 (335 vs 310)
發表於 2011-4-1 12:53:06 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
本帖最後由 fiendgreg 於 2011-4-1 12:55 編輯
    重量上係冇分別 320g 同319g 根本上就一樣(唔計wilson D 咁差做工)
但2 支個balance pt. ...
jiken810 發表於 2011-4-1 10:59


認同Wilson 做工真是「一流」
頭重(or Less HL)一點也真的是Swingweight 愈高
但Swingweight不是愈高,就愈省力嗎??
為什麼blade 98 比90 還要多用點力??
另外,你說的 B90 應該不是US版,因為重量是320g
那麼穿線前應是12 HL,但穿線後,Balance pt. 應該和TW上的數據有出入。
不過應該差異不大,順便一提而已。
發表於 2011-4-1 15:14:00 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
回復 15# fiendgreg

我是說 asia version 的B90,
因 us version B90  unstung 340g + 12pt swingweight 係333
2 個version我都試過, 但我體質上真係打唔到支美版

"Swingweight不是愈高,就愈省力嗎??"
Definition:Swing weight describes how heavy a racquet feels when it is swung. Swing weight increases as the racquet's weight is distributed more toward the head, so head-heavy and extra-long racquets have a high swing weight in relation to their stationary weight. A high swing weight results in low maneuverability, but generally more groundstroke power.
copy from: http://tennis.about.com/library/blswingweight.htm  
其實係好physis 問題: E=MCsq
第一句解釋左 Blade 98 比 B90(asia) 要用多D 力去swing
最後一句就講左: blade 98 係會比B90 powerful D (Mass/swingweight of blade 98 > b90, if same accleration)但難D control (blade 98 要出力D先可以等同B90 accleration, 第一句的問題)

理論上係咁, 但都係要睇下用家個form 係點
發表於 2011-4-1 15:33:26 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
hi pok011026,

Six One is head light in 16x19 string pattern; Blade 98 is head heavy in 16x18.
I used to play K version on both of them. May be a bit differ from BLX but Six One version is stiffer, more control and good feel when you hit the smaller sweetspot comparatively. Blade 98 is more comfy, forgiving with the larger sweetspot.

If you are all court player, headlight is better; you are baseliner, headheavy is your choice.
Also, you looking for US version or Asia version??
80 字節以內
不支持自定義 Discuz! 代碼

發私人信息給Gary

發表於 2011-4-1 16:11:06 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
回復  fiendgreg

我是說 asia version 的B90,
因 us version B90  unstung 340g + 12pt swingweight 係3 ...
jiken810 發表於 2011-4-1 15:14

其實 B90 亞版同美版打落唔差好遠,美版底線好打啲,亞版上網靈活啲...應該唔會打得到一支打唔到另一支,可能要時間去習慣啫...
發表於 2011-4-1 19:13:33 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
各位師兄,想請教一下 Balance pt. 的 幾多 pt HL 係代表甚麼?
發表於 2011-4-1 21:14:25 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
本帖最後由 embu31 於 2011-4-1 21:16 編輯

回復 19# clivia


Balance: Static measure of weight distribution in a racquet and measured from the butt end in inches and/or centimeters. Commonly referenced in "points" head light or head heavy - each "point" represents 1/8 inch. Generally speaking, heavier racquets are head light to maintain maneuverability, while most of today's super-light racquets are head heavy to supply enough mass (which translates into power) to the area of the frame where the ball is being contacted. A 27 inch racquet with a balance point of 12-1/2 inches is 1 inch, or 8 points head light (even balance would be 13-1/2 inches). A 28 inch racquet with a balance point of 15 inches is 1 inch (or 8 points) head heavy. Static balance ultimately affects swingweight, which is a dynamic measure of racquet maneuverability.

Swingweight: Measure of how heavy a racquet feels when swung, i.e. maneuverability. Also known as Moment of Inertia or Second Moment, swingweight is dependent on several factors, including racquet weight, length, balance, head size. A heavy swingweight racquet is more powerful than a light swingweight racquet (ATBE), but will be less maneuverable. Also, a heavy swingweight racquet can be relatively light in overall weight by placing the majority of weight in the head. A trend initiated by Wilson with their Hammer racquets, the objective is to retain maneuverability without sacrificing power by distributing most of the overall weight to the upper hoop, where ball contact is made. Swingweight can be increased by adding weight above the pivot point (where the racquet is gripped) or by increasing length. Swingweight (like overall weight) cannot be reduced unless the bumper is removed or racquet length is reduced. Keep this in mind when selecting a racquet to purchase - better to error on the light side and add weight if needed.

Here is a simple way to put it:
A heavier frame generates more power.
A heavier frame vibrates less.
A heavier frame has a larger sweetspot.
A stiffer frame generates more power.
A stiffer frame has a larger sweetspot.
A stiffer frame transmits more of the shock load to the arm than a more flexible frame.
A stiffer frame provides a more uniform ball response across the entire string plane.
A larger frame generates more power.
A larger frame is more resistant to twisting.
A larger frame has a larger sweetspot.
A longer frame generates more velocity and therefore more power.
The string bed in a longer frame generates more spin due to increased velocity.

Source : Tennis Warehouse
W6網球»主頁 網球討論區 網球裝備討論
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 登記 Register

本版積分規則

代購網站
美國 Tennis Warehouse
歐洲 Tennis Warehouse
美國 Running Warehouse

衣服尺碼參考         鞋尺碼參考
美國   歐洲             美國   歐洲 

備注: 如尺碼不合適可補回運費更換同款而不同尺碼.

 網站資訊 | 代購網球用品報價區 | 二手網球拍買賣 | 二手網球用品買賣| 二手非網球用品買賣| 網球教練| 網球討論區| 找波友打網球


手機版
©2007-2016  香港W6網球用品訂購網. All Rights Reserved.
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表