Pure storm GT 用後報告

8 1775
發表於 2009-10-29 22:53:34 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文

回復 4# radical-minded 的帖子

試過radical-minded 支PST.特點係非常舒服.軟拍.但係低swingweight冇power.唔夠solid.底線打上旋容易有ballfeel,control.但係唔夠plowthrough.Volley非常靈活.但係由於空心柄感覺冇咁實在.我個人覺得塊拍設計好完美.只係swingweight低唔啱我.我打開發球上網,單反.swingweight低volley好難頂.面對重砲,暴力底線swingweight低單反好難捱.如我會加鉛在3,9點提高塊拍的swingweight,power及穩定性.另外此拍令我諗起Tecnifibre Tfight 320 VO2 max.性格好似.不過Tfight 320硬d多d power但係都係swingweight低比較振.面對暴力底線年代,swingweight好重要.唔怪得Gonzalez,Verdasco都在3,9點加鉛.如想塊拍舒服swingweight大又唔想塊拍太重.近期試過最正係Head youtek radical pro(Murray)
發表於 2009-11-9 11:31:31 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
對pure storm tour呢支球拍,我有唔同意見。我買□左,試過幾次,慢慢了解呢支球拍□既特性。
1) 呢支球拍底線一流,係專for 底線球員使用。動作愈大,愈完整,呢支球拍就愈好打,因為整體感覺軟,波停留係拍面上□既時間非常之長,所以控制同埋力量都非常之好。呢個要感謝woofer設計,同64□既硬度。但係,相對於鐘意打硬拍,鍾意pop非常之快□既球員,呢支球拍就唔係咁適合。
2) swingweight唔高唔低,□岩□岩好,一兩次就可以適應。呢支球拍swingweight有333g左右,其實同K90差唔多,打出去時□既感覺,PST比較平D,柔軟D,K90比較SPIN,同埋硬D。但係PST總重量低20g,所以可以加快SWING□既速度,一樣可以將波打得好快,而且唔會覺得揮起來好重。面對強波都幾穩定。
3) 開波正。有小小柔軟感覺令得呢支球拍開FLAT波非常之正,我個人覺得,開FLAT比K90好。22寬邊加強□左FLAT SERVE□既速度同穩定。前提係,動作要完整。一旦打中,拍線緊咬住波,停一陣之後,波從拍面飛出去時真係好爽,波又重又平。我用呢支球拍開flat,強過K90. 但second serve就係K90易spin。
4) Volley馬馬。拍頭3,9位置重量唔夠,同埋比較密線設計,拍軟身D,所以打volley時有小小"滯",因此一定要"推"波,先可以打得靚。我個人覺得,volley係呢支球拍最大缺點,當然,如果係一個volley動作完整□既球員,可能仲鍾意用呢支球拍打volley。
5) 舒服。呢支球拍極舒服,拍身不硬不軟,係我呢排試過最舒服□既球拍之一,比YY舒服好多。比K90,aero pro,Head speed pro都舒服,同dunlop aerogel 4D差唔多舒服,又有D似head microgel。

總體來講,呢支球拍係一支個性傳統□既球拍,俾我諗起以前90年代□既球拍,但又將好多問題改進。呢支球拍比較適合 1) 鍾意大力開 flat serve,2) 鐘意打底線 flat 波,3) 動作完整,4) 有力,5) 打法比較傳統。
感覺有D似之前Wilson N Code N95 18X20。
比較唔適合3.0以下□既球員,亦都唔適合打top spin□既球員。
發表於 2009-11-10 00:35:10 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文

回復 8# penetration 的帖子

恭喜你搵到啱自己嘅拍!我依家用緊ignite 95.始終k90個feel最正.如果k90個spec有93至95頭就好lu
發表於 2009-11-10 09:39:16 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
睇過BLX未?我本來諗住要等BLX 90 tour,但係一睇spec, Da個326g swingweight....sigh
好驚拍頭會被強波震開添。
我打PST GT最大□既問題係volley,始終打唔出自己想要□既波
我多數打雙打,volley唔夠好,簡直係得一個字:死!
以前用K90,多數機會volley都可以打死人,依家用呢支球拍,經常叉燒出現,用力一板打落去,哇!又俾對手打番□黎,真係嘔血都有分。
用□左呢支球拍之後,底線強□左,開波強□左,依家打雙打,底線得分多過網前,volley都羅唔到分,死未?
發表於 2009-11-10 13:52:25 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文

回復 10# penetration 的帖子

試下在7吋位(top of handle)加鉛可提高volley穩定性又不失靈活性.如在3,9點加鉛效果仲好不過又要counter weight攪到整體重左.空心柄打volley真係唔掂.
發表於 2009-11-10 15:23:42 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
Guys, I have just tested the lighter version Pure Storm GT.  I love it! Despite its low static weight (295g unstrung), it is as stable as the tour.  More important, I like the increased manuverability and room for customization.  I could lead up the 3 & 9 o'clock positions without the racket being too sluggish.  I think I am gonna stick playing with it for the time being.
發表於 2009-11-11 14:34:14 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
ok, Radical, I have two doubts.
A) will the racquet face be pushed by heavy shots? especially when vollying or late hitting.
B) Is the ball heavy enough as PST GT?  I really love the heavy ball what PST GT made, quite heavy.

Go buy a new one and lent us.
發表於 2009-11-12 15:43:59 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
Hi Radical,
after trying my youtek radial pro, what's the difference between your babolat?
發表於 2009-11-12 15:58:36 | 顯示全部樓層 简体中文繁體中文
Penetration Hing,
Yes, it may not be as stable as PST. This was particular a problem when I rallied heavy balls sent by Rafter this Monday. Anyway, I like its room for customization. For heaviness, I have no chance to compare but I guess heaviness come from the amount of spin. With PS I could hit with more spin (easier to generate racket head speed), so it can also hit heavy shots.

Alex Hing,
To me, Radical Pro is better at baseline and everything except it maybe a bit too powerful. You know I am not a powerful hitter. Also, serving is an very important part of my game, especially for developing confidence. I would like to have a racket with lower swingweight for serving.
W6網球»主頁 網球討論區 網球裝備討論
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 登記 Register

本版積分規則

代購網站
美國 Tennis Warehouse
歐洲 Tennis Warehouse
美國 Running Warehouse

衣服尺碼參考         鞋尺碼參考
美國   歐洲             美國   歐洲 

備注: 如尺碼不合適可補回運費更換同款而不同尺碼.

 網站資訊 | 代購網球用品報價區 | 二手網球拍買賣 | 二手網球用品買賣| 二手非網球用品買賣| 網球教練| 網球討論區| 找波友打網球


©2007-2017  香港W6網球用品訂購網. All Rights Reserved.
主頁 > 網球討論區 > 網球裝備討論
!send_threads!|
!forum_views!1775|帖數8|收藏
rafter 顯示全部樓層
2009-10-29 22:53:34

回復 4# radical-minded 的帖子

試過radical-minded 支PST.特點係非常舒服.軟拍.但係低swingweight冇power.唔夠solid.底線打上旋容易有ballfeel,control.但係唔夠plowthrough.Volley非常靈活.但係由於空心柄感覺冇咁實在.我個人覺得塊拍設計好完美.只係swingweight低唔啱我.我打開發球上網,單反.swingweight低volley好難頂.面對重砲,暴力底線swingweight低單反好難捱.如我會加鉛在3,9點提高塊拍的swingweight,power及穩定性.另外此拍令我諗起Tecnifibre Tfight 320 VO2 max.性格好似.不過Tfight 320硬d多d power但係都係swingweight低比較振.面對暴力底線年代,swingweight好重要.唔怪得Gonzalez,Verdasco都在3,9點加鉛.如想塊拍舒服swingweight大又唔想塊拍太重.近期試過最正係Head youtek radical pro(Murray)
penetration 顯示全部樓層
2009-11-9 11:31:31
對pure storm tour呢支球拍,我有唔同意見。我買□左,試過幾次,慢慢了解呢支球拍□既特性。
1) 呢支球拍底線一流,係專for 底線球員使用。動作愈大,愈完整,呢支球拍就愈好打,因為整體感覺軟,波停留係拍面上□既時間非常之長,所以控制同埋力量都非常之好。呢個要感謝woofer設計,同64□既硬度。但係,相對於鐘意打硬拍,鍾意pop非常之快□既球員,呢支球拍就唔係咁適合。
2) swingweight唔高唔低,□岩□岩好,一兩次就可以適應。呢支球拍swingweight有333g左右,其實同K90差唔多,打出去時□既感覺,PST比較平D,柔軟D,K90比較SPIN,同埋硬D。但係PST總重量低20g,所以可以加快SWING□既速度,一樣可以將波打得好快,而且唔會覺得揮起來好重。面對強波都幾穩定。
3) 開波正。有小小柔軟感覺令得呢支球拍開FLAT波非常之正,我個人覺得,開FLAT比K90好。22寬邊加強□左FLAT SERVE□既速度同穩定。前提係,動作要完整。一旦打中,拍線緊咬住波,停一陣之後,波從拍面飛出去時真係好爽,波又重又平。我用呢支球拍開flat,強過K90. 但second serve就係K90易spin。
4) Volley馬馬。拍頭3,9位置重量唔夠,同埋比較密線設計,拍軟身D,所以打volley時有小小"滯",因此一定要"推"波,先可以打得靚。我個人覺得,volley係呢支球拍最大缺點,當然,如果係一個volley動作完整□既球員,可能仲鍾意用呢支球拍打volley。
5) 舒服。呢支球拍極舒服,拍身不硬不軟,係我呢排試過最舒服□既球拍之一,比YY舒服好多。比K90,aero pro,Head speed pro都舒服,同dunlop aerogel 4D差唔多舒服,又有D似head microgel。

總體來講,呢支球拍係一支個性傳統□既球拍,俾我諗起以前90年代□既球拍,但又將好多問題改進。呢支球拍比較適合 1) 鍾意大力開 flat serve,2) 鐘意打底線 flat 波,3) 動作完整,4) 有力,5) 打法比較傳統。
感覺有D似之前Wilson N Code N95 18X20。
比較唔適合3.0以下□既球員,亦都唔適合打top spin□既球員。
rafter 顯示全部樓層
2009-11-10 00:35:10

回復 8# penetration 的帖子

恭喜你搵到啱自己嘅拍!我依家用緊ignite 95.始終k90個feel最正.如果k90個spec有93至95頭就好lu
penetration 顯示全部樓層
2009-11-10 09:39:16
睇過BLX未?我本來諗住要等BLX 90 tour,但係一睇spec, Da個326g swingweight....sigh
好驚拍頭會被強波震開添。
我打PST GT最大□既問題係volley,始終打唔出自己想要□既波
我多數打雙打,volley唔夠好,簡直係得一個字:死!
以前用K90,多數機會volley都可以打死人,依家用呢支球拍,經常叉燒出現,用力一板打落去,哇!又俾對手打番□黎,真係嘔血都有分。
用□左呢支球拍之後,底線強□左,開波強□左,依家打雙打,底線得分多過網前,volley都羅唔到分,死未?
rafter 顯示全部樓層
2009-11-10 13:52:25

回復 10# penetration 的帖子

試下在7吋位(top of handle)加鉛可提高volley穩定性又不失靈活性.如在3,9點加鉛效果仲好不過又要counter weight攪到整體重左.空心柄打volley真係唔掂.
radical-minded 顯示全部樓層
2009-11-10 15:23:42
Guys, I have just tested the lighter version Pure Storm GT.  I love it! Despite its low static weight (295g unstrung), it is as stable as the tour.  More important, I like the increased manuverability and room for customization.  I could lead up the 3 & 9 o'clock positions without the racket being too sluggish.  I think I am gonna stick playing with it for the time being.
penetration 顯示全部樓層
2009-11-11 14:34:14
ok, Radical, I have two doubts.
A) will the racquet face be pushed by heavy shots? especially when vollying or late hitting.
B) Is the ball heavy enough as PST GT?  I really love the heavy ball what PST GT made, quite heavy.

Go buy a new one and lent us.
alexyuman 顯示全部樓層
2009-11-12 15:43:59
Hi Radical,
after trying my youtek radial pro, what's the difference between your babolat?
radical-minded 顯示全部樓層
2009-11-12 15:58:36
Penetration Hing,
Yes, it may not be as stable as PST. This was particular a problem when I rallied heavy balls sent by Rafter this Monday. Anyway, I like its room for customization. For heaviness, I have no chance to compare but I guess heaviness come from the amount of spin. With PS I could hit with more spin (easier to generate racket head speed), so it can also hit heavy shots.

Alex Hing,
To me, Radical Pro is better at baseline and everything except it maybe a bit too powerful. You know I am not a powerful hitter. Also, serving is an very important part of my game, especially for developing confidence. I would like to have a racket with lower swingweight for serving.

 網站資訊 | 代購網球用品報價區 | 二手網球拍買賣 | 二手網球用品買賣| 二手非網球用品買賣| 網球教練| 網球討論區| 找波友打網球


©2007-2017  香港W6網球用品訂購網. All Rights Reserved.
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表